Talk:Kimberly Anyadike/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Codyorb (talk · contribs) 18:11, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Beginning the GA review for Kimberly Anyadike. Codyorb (talk) 18:11, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- Reliable citations are used throughout the article. No plagiarism or original content found.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Article is comprehensive. It does not leave out any major details and does not go into unnecessary detail.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- No bias found in the article
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Article is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- All images are appropriately used and licensed.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Codyorb (talk) 20:50, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Review reopened
[edit]Per a discussion at Codyorb's talk page, this review is being reopened, and further work will include contributions from Mike Christie, who has agreed to give a second opinion on the state of the article, given that Codyorb is new at reviewing, and some issues came to light. BlueMoonset (talk) 07:01, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Re-review by Mike Christie
[edit]The lead is too short; it should be a summary of the article. Currently it omits some significant information.
Other than that I think the article is ready for promotion to GA. A note for future reference: Earwig found this, but it appears that article was taken from Wikipedia, rather than the other way around. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 10:21, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
- I'm currently trying to expand the lead with information from the body of the article. Codyorb (talk) 16:01, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
- I've expanded the lead section to 2 paragraphs. Codyorb (talk) 18:36, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, Codyorb. I've modified it a bit; the most important facts about her relate to the flight, so I cut some of the biographical material you added and put in a bit more about the flight. This looks good enough now, so I am promoting the article. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:47, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
- I've expanded the lead section to 2 paragraphs. Codyorb (talk) 18:36, 16 February 2018 (UTC)