Jump to content

Talk:Kimberley Kates

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Scientologist?

[edit]

¿? Yesitsnot (talk) 11:36, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kimberley Kates. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:50, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kimberley Kates.jpg

[edit]

This image was in the article, but does not look anything like the person it claims to depict, as you can verify with a Google Image search. It's not merely airbrushed or tweaked with PhotoShop, like many celebrity photos are; it's so digitally distorted to be more like a digital avatar than a photograph. Wikipedia:Photoshopped images says that "misrepresentations of things have no place on Wikipedia" and specifically says that photo modifications which "change the appearance or position of body features such as hair or the eyes" are unacceptable. MartinPoulter (talk) 19:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]