Talk:Kimberley Brewery

I see this page is earmarked for a cleanup. This is not how I originally left the page. It was neat and tidy. As a relative newcomer to Wikipedia, I do not have the knowledge to alter the page to Wikipedia format so I'd appreciate help from whoever decimated the page. LJ Ray Sutton Bridge 14:17, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear LJ Ray Sutton Bridge

The mess which you see now is that which has been done to clean up the page since the request for clean up was made as you can see by the dates of the additions. If you click on the history tab at the top of the page you will see that the request for clean up was made after your most recent addition and before my first addition. There is nothing which you need to do to further to clean up this page. However, if you have more information, or know of other references please add this in, following the existing format.

PS. I have removed the Clean Up request

Yours Faithfully Martin Cordon 19:52, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:H&hlogo.jpg

Image:H&hlogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:39, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kimberley Brewery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927091950/http://www.broxtowe.gov.uk/index/unused_pages/planning/planning_conservation/conservation_kim.htm to http://www.broxtowe.gov.uk/index/unused_pages/planning/planning_conservation/conservation_kim.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:47, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]