Talk:Kim Wehle

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Women in Red: #1day1woman (2019)

This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2019. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 27 April 2019 by reviewer Ritchie333 (talk · contribs).

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

@Megalibrarygirl:, can you take a look at this and address the tag? The article still looks a bit ropey IMHO. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 17:13, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

Yes, I'd feel much better if someone could find some secondary sources; I came up dry but didn't look under her maiden name. Yngvadottir (talk) 17:22, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ritchie333 and Yngvadottir: I'll take a look. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:49, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ritchie333 and Yngvadottir: since she has some books coming out, there should be more coverage of her. Right now, I'm not finding anything in the databases. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 21:28, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay; as a tenured professor of University of Baltimore School of Law, she meets WP:PROF and has hits in Google Scholar such as (this), although not much in the way of citations. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 21:38, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I believe she squeaks by (although she doesn't have a named chair); I don't at all want to take away from her successes. But the lack of third-party refs is really disturbing. (I also think there's some padding by repetition, not only between the lead and the body with respect to where she's published/been interviewed, but also in her career, and I'd particularly like to get Whitewater down to a mention in passing. But the lack of dates made me reluctant to try cutting.) I hope those books get some reviews. Thanks for looking, Megalibrarygirl. Yngvadottir (talk) 16:52, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing, tone

I find the further edits to this article by Catscott17, the article creator, to have unbalanced it still further with promotional language and unreferenced material, while not remedying the lack of independent references. I've made a quick fix, including hiding unreferenced personal information, but since Catscott17 admits to being a confidant of some sort of the article subject, I'd like further eyes on the matter. It may be that we can simply cut it back drastically on the assumption that reviews of the forthcoming books will enable reexpansion based on those references. Or maybe Catscott17 can find us some existing press via their knowledge of what was published where and when. Otherwise, I'm tempted to AfD this as too soon, until the books have actually made a splash. Pinging Ritchie333 and Megalibrarygirl. Yngvadottir (talk) 19:47, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Kim Wehle Headshot.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:07, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]