Talk:Kim Jew
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 12 March 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
|
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Question from editor
[edit]I am not sure why this page is being considered for deletion; the entry does not have any issues that would make it a candidate for deletion. The sources cited are not PR pieces, but legitimate news stories crafted by journalists, not Kim Jew himself. The breadth of sources shows that there is significant coverage of Kim Jew as a photographer; the sources are reliable news sources; the sources are written from a third party perspective; and the sources are independent of the subject. Based on this criteria, I believe that the Wikipedia entry about Kim Jew should be presumed suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Additionally, Kim Jew's notability spans decades, demonstrating that the independent coverage cited is not short-term interest.
I understand that Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion....and this entry does not read as such. It is not advocating people to take an action, it is not an opinion piece....it is written from a neutral point fo view, using an objective style to state facts about Kim Jew's life and notable contributions to the field of photography.
Please advise on why you are considering this entry for deletion.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Fredniferitz (talk • contribs)
Advert
[edit]I reapplied the advert tag that was removed without explanation. The reason it feels like an advert is that it simply talks about how great the subject is, with mostly proper references, but does very little to explain what the person actually does that's so great. I'm now the third person that thinks this is a puff piece so the author will have to do more than just remove the tag and give a small explanation to convince people. OlYellerTalktome 19:24, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kim Jew. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050523012126/http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m5092/is_5_25/ai_76966887 to http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m5092/is_5_25/ai_76966887/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:25, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Kim Jew. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110514010405/http://www.sandiaprep.org/college/ourgraduates.htm to http://www.sandiaprep.org/college/ourgraduates.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110728172626/http://www.weemsinternationalartfest.org/page2.html to http://www.weemsinternationalartfest.org/page2.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110304110234/http://www.kimjew.com/photographers/presidential-photography/ to http://www.kimjew.com/photographers/presidential-photography/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:05, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Orphan article message
[edit]
Please help this orphan article by adding links to it in related articles and lists. Once it has an incoming link from at least one article or list, the orphan tag can be removed (disambiguation pages, redirects and draft articles do not count). Three or more incoming links are ideal. The Find link tool may help, but not in all cases.