Talk:Kim Pu-sik

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by one or more inactive working groups.

Buddhism Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 19 July 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Kim Bu-sik to Kim Pu-sik. The result of the discussion was moved.

Untitled

hmm, is it supposed to be Kim Bu-sik, with a hyphen? Appleby 23:33, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Kim Busik?

The current title of the page is "Kim Bu-sik," the lede starts with "Kim Busik" (no hyphen), and the infobox gives two Romanizations: "Gim Busik" (RR) and "Kim Pusik" (MR). That's four different forms, and the title matches neither the lede nor the two most common Romanizations.

The convention on Romanization of Korean names says we should keep the more common "Kim" instead of "Gim," but that otherwise we should use the Revised Romanization for pre-1945 Korean names. This means we should move the page to Kim Busik. Would anyone object to that? Cheers, Madalibi (talk) 04:19, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NCKO states pre-1945 Korean names should follow McCune-Reischauer. Kim Pu-sik would also be in line with WP:COMMONNAME according to Google NGram, which is expected since MR is the favored romanization in academic literature on Korea. I've created a move request below. Motjustescribe (talk) 02:12, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits: 30 Mar 2015

The recent edit removed links to the existing Wikipedia articles and the only external verifiable reference. It also restored a factually wrong statement: Yejong was a king (and a vassal of Liang), not an emperor, and removed all the political background. While information about Kim's role in development of Korean spirituality is interesting, it was not supported by any sources. Finally, large parts of the new/old text need stylistic and grammatical revisions and should be made compliant with the Wikipedia rules about language neutrality. I'll be happy to keep all the additions of Idh0854 provided that can be properly referenced, and will restore my text. Drterno (talk) 09:57, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Gim Hongdo which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 07:29, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 19 July 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Frost 02:40, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Bu-sik → Kim Pu-sik – Per WP:NCKO, McCune–Reischauer romanization should be used for pre-1945 Korean names. Google NGram shows Kim Pu-sik enjoys greater currency, and therefore, supported by WP:COMMONNAME. Motjustescribe (talk) 02:05, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nomination. Following its creation in April 2006, the main title header of this entry has been moved three times and the proposed name form appears to represent stability. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 04:01, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 12:00, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.