Talk:Kim Bong-hwan/GA1

GA Review

Passed. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 15:30, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: BeanieFan11 (talk · contribs) 02:43, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: WikiOriginal-9 (talk · contribs) 04:11, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Expand lead some.
Added cat: North Korean military personnel
Ref for that note?

This article isn't super long but there'a not much to say about this guy for obvious reasons. Nice work on the picture. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 04:11, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiOriginal-9: Addressed the two points. BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:23, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I did a spot check of sources and did not find any issues. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 20:00, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.