Talk:Kilmessan railway station

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Stations

Trains Portal

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Stations.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Dublin-Navan railway line.

Merge proposal

The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived: outcome was: merged/redirected

For the same reasons previously set out at Talk:Dublin–Navan railway line#Merge proposal, I propose to merge/redirect this title to Dublin–Navan railway line#Extension to Navan. All the same WP:MERGEREASONs apply:

In terms of the "short text" rationale, as this an article on a subject (that does not exist and may never exist) it cannot reasonably be expanded beyond what we already have
In terms of the "overlap/duplicate" rationale, the existing content already duplicates the content at Dublin–Navan railway line#Extension to Navan (station at Kilmessan was proposed, never progressed, may never progress).
In terms of the "context" rationale, and similar to the above, what limited speculative content might remain here can only be read/understood in the context of the (unprogressed) rail project it forms part of.

Otherwise WP:CRYSTAL, WP:VER, WP:TOOSOON and any number of other criteria apply. Guliolopez (talk) 00:44, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bump. It's been several weeks, and I haven't heard any other thoughts. If there are no other comments, I'll likely go ahead with the proposed merge/redirect in the coming days. Guliolopez (talk) 01:53, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved. Another week or so has passed. And, absent any other thoughts, I've gone ahead with the merge/redirect. If or when the subject ever gets beyond initial proposal phase, the title can easily be restored. Guliolopez (talk) 16:26, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]