Talk:Killing Me Softly (film)

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: British

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.

Cover Image

Seems to me that we have a slight dispute over which of the images to use. I personally prefer the one I uploaded, Killing-Me-Softly-Film.png, but I'm open to persuasion. Rob Church ^{Talk | Desk} 02:20, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I replaced the existing image with the poster for the unrated version of the film Image:Killing_Me_Softly_Poster.jpg. It has less artifacting than the previous image, and is only slightly bigger in size. --Fizan 11:19, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Things to Add

Basic plot needs cleaning up, bits need taking out where non-relevant; keep it a bit generic. Add a spoiler notice.
More about production, similar films the director has done, etc.
Categorisation
Any awards?

FIX NOW

She spends the remainder of the movie trying to uncover Adam's mysterious past and but resist her sexual attraction towards him.

the and but bit is the part i want fixed

Pictures

Is it necessary to show pictures from the sex scene? Wikipedia is, after all, an encyclopedia, and the entry for "pornography" usually isn't accompanied with pictures. If there is no logical reason for the pictures to be there, they shouldn't be. They add to the article in no other way than either a.) arousing some high-school kid using a family computer, or b.) unnecessarily showing pure gratuitous nudity to anyone who comes to the article (children can use the internet, too). I'm reworking the article, if you feel that it needs to be changed back, please discuss it on my talk page. Thank you. Zchris87v 09:25, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the sex scene pictures are a must, as this is no ordinary soft-porn, this is the kind of movie that generations of young men will grow up masturbating to - I know I did. Ms. Graham deserves a Nobel prize. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.241.5.61 (talk) 08:53, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Killing Me Softly Poster.jpg

Image:Killing Me Softly Poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:39, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heather Graham

Heather showed her boobies! Yay! Tool-apc (talk) 00:03, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sex

was the sex on this show real?!?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Weatherbed (talk • contribs) 20:35, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I highly doubt that it was real, as this is Heather Graham we're talking about here, but still, it looks pretty real, and it'd be nice if it was. Tool-apc (talk) 01:06, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]