Talk:Kielanowski Institute of Animal Physiology and Nutrition of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Copyright

The Kielanowski Institute of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, Polish Academy of Sciences (and its Polish version) Wikipedia article was published basing on the Institute official web page www.ifzz.pl. The user Aggattaa got the permission from the Institute Director to use materials from the www.ifzz.pl to create Wikipedia article (permission was sent to Wikipedia office). --Aggattaa (talk) 08:42, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, Aggattaa. Just so you know, getting permission from the copyright holder for use on Wikipedia is not sufficient to allow copyrighted material on Wikipedia. It must be released under an open license so anyone on the internet can use it. The procedure is listed at WP:DONATETEXT. If the permission sent is not something like the form found at WP:CONSENT, it will not be sufficient. Thanks, and happy editing! — crh ₂₃ (Talk) 08:48, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The institute's own description of itself is likely not suitable for an encyclopedia article in any case. The institute and its work should be described in neutral language, based largely on what independent sources say about it. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:55, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aggattaa, the text has been removed for now (please see below). If permission was sent to OTRS, the sender should have received an automated reply with a long number beginning "2017". If you post that number here I will look into the permission and log it here if it is acceptable. But please be aware that, as Cordless Larry says above, the institute's self-description is anyway not likely to be suitable for an encyclopaedia, which should be based on what is written in independent reliable sources. That brings to the next problem: where are those sources? I can't find a single one (but then I don't read Polish). If suitable sources aren't found, this page should probably be merged or redirected. Oh, Aggattaa, do you have some connection to the institute? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:39, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.ifzz.pl/en/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:32, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]