Talk:Kids on the Slope/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Moneytrees (talk · contribs) 19:09, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
File:Kuroshima14.jpg might have been tagged in a way that doesn't comply with Japan's FOP, but I can figure that out for you. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk🌴Help out at CCI!} 03:21, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It does, passed. This is an impressive article and it's clear that you've put a lot of effort into it. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk🌴Help out at CCI!} 02:44, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]