Jump to content

Talk:Kidnap (2017 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Writing

[edit]

I haven't seen the movie, so I can't really do this myself, but the writing is very hard to understand (and contains numerous errors). Samer (talk) 04:06, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Call similarities

[edit]

Shouldn't the heavy similarities between The Call (2013 film) and this film be referenced somewhere, except for a mention in the 'See also' section? Are they connected in any way (It would surprise me if they weren't)? It seems almost comical seeing both posters side by side. -Throast (talk) 23:29, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Kidnap (2017 film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 01:08, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Comments

[edit]
  • The last four producers and the editor mentioned in the infobox are not mentioned in those roles (or not mentioned at all) in the body nor are they cited in the infobox. Di Bonaventura Pictures is abbreviated as "di B Pictures" in the infobox, the shouldn't it be "dB Pictures"?
 Working Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:21, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done 1. Added Panic Room format. 2. The company is credited as "di B Pictures" in the poster. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:30, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "... with Halle Berry attached to star ..." The use of "attached to" in the phrase sounds odd, I would suggest using "featured as" instead. I would also suggest adding a comma before the "with".
 Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:21, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "... while still owing the feature itself $15 million ..." This phrase isn't very clear. I would suggest adding a "worth" after itself.
 Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:21, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

[edit]
  1. Comprehension: The comprehension is good.
  2. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (prose) The prose is generally clear, concise and understandable. Pass Pass
    (b) (MoS) The article is compliant with the manual of style. Pass Pass
  3. Verifiability: The article is verifiable.
  4. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (references) The article has a list of references and in-line citations for its contents in the body. Pass Pass
    (b) (citations to reliable sources) Sources used are reliable. Pass Pass
    (c) (original research) No original research found. Pass Pass
    (d) (copyvio and plagiarism) No flagrant copyright issues found. Pass Pass
  5. Comprehensiveness: The article is comprehensive.
  6. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (major aspects) The article broadly covers all major aspects. Pass Pass
    (b) (focused) The article is focused without unnecessary deviations. Pass Pass
  7. Neutrality: The article is neutral.
  8. Pass Pass
    Notes Result
    The article is compliant with the policy on neutral point of view. Pass Pass
  9. Stability: The article is stable.
  10. Pass Pass
    Notes Result
    No ongoing content disputes or edit wars present. Pass Pass
  11. Illustration: The article is well illustrated.
  12. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) No copyright issues found, images are appropriately tagged. Pass Pass
    (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) Use and caption are good. Pass Pass