Talk:Ki language

This page was proposed for deletion by Copyrightpower1337 (talk · contribs) on 18 January 2021 with the comment:
No information online and unlikely to be expanded. Listed as having 26,000 speakers almost 40 years ago, language likely has died out.
It was contested by Matt91486 (talk · contribs) on 2021-01-18 with the comment:
Removed PROD. It has sources. Whether the sources are online is entirely irrelevant, as is its possibility of future expansion. A stub is not a reason for deletion.

Africa

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Languages

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Added Biloa source

Biloa, E. (2013). Syntax of Tuki: A Cartographic Approach. John Benjamins Publishing Company. UICLing (talk) 22:03, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Biloa (2013, p. 35) also references 26,000 speaker number but I didn't know how to edit the box without removing other citation.

Possible title change

All sources seem to describe this language as Tuki. I don't think I've found any sources that describe it as Ki. The glottolog and ethnologue both list it as Tuki. Is this appropriate circumstance for a name change? IntergalacticOboist (talk) 12:13, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]