Talk:Khvalynsk culture

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia: History / Demographics & ethnography Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the demographics and ethnography of Russia task force.

Old talk

Is it derived from the city name of Khvalynsk or from the general Khvalyn area of Caspian Sea, used in such geological terms as "Khvalyn terrace", "Khvalyn sediments," etc. ? mikka (t) 17:10, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

it's named for two cemeteries found near the modern town. I'm guessing that Saratov Oblast and Samara Oblast are on opposite sides of the Volga. This might be significant in explaining the apparent problem with the dates.

For the dates see my note at Talk:Samara culture --FourthAve 14:11, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"Holocene Epoch"

Which layman on earth continuously confuses these geologic/biological subdivisions into prehistory/archaeology!? We have our own subdivisions as e.g. neolithic. 195.4.77.253 (talk) 14:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Did it spread all the way to Nalchik?

The article states "A 67 m high earthen kurgan at Nalchik, approximately thirty metres in diameter, contained 121 individual graves...".

Two questions on this: first of al these dimension seem impossible (67 m high with a diameter of 30 m, would look much like the great lighthouse of Alexandria. Secondly the place mentioned is almost in the Caucasus, so if this is right the map is wrong, or does the map only show the original site and did they quickly spread out from there during the fifth millenium BC. If so, this would be the logical precursor of the Maykop-culture (being situated right in the centre of Maykop) and it would be nice to read something about such connections, if correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Codiv (talk • contribs) 13:02, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

More mistakes

The map contradicts the geographical range described in the intro. Please correct Yourself. Thank You. HJJHolm (talk) 08:38, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct in that someone had included a range without a cited reference. The map reflects the map found in the Mallory & Adams, now corrected. 14.2.199.154 (talk) 06:16, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]