Talk:Kharwar

Proposed merge with Kharwar caste

The two articles appear to be about the same community but there is no need for the "caste" disambig in the title Sitush (talk) 14:24, 4 February 2017 (UTC) Kharwar caste is not tribe,they are rajput.their ancestors were rajput. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.233.119.210 (talk) 13:38, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

@Sitush: 103.233.119.210 is distinguishing between caste and tribe here, but I'm not sure that that is an argument against the merge. Any contention regarding definition could be discussed on the same page. So, I support the merge proposal. Klbrain (talk) 06:34, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

::Looking again, the distinction between tribe and caste is potentially important, so would require clear evidence to merge. Klbrain (talk) 07:18, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Closing, given no evidence in support and merge contested. Klbrain (talk) 07:50, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

@Klbrain: this article explains the caste/tribe issue. Whatever the merits of the argument (they have been officially redesignated by the government but that is often a political thing), the two articles are referring to the same people. The IP's Rajput claim is just the usual political stuff, too - see Sanskritisation. Those of us who work a lot in this topic area are used to seeing unsubstantiated claims of connections to groups that reflect some sort of glory on a community because that is part of the Indian psyche. Sorry for not replying sooner but I was very ill around June-September and did little here. - Sitush (talk) 06:39, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

@Sitush: Hope that you're better. I certainly very happy to defer to your expertise on this topic; I don't mind it the closing being reversed if you're in the mood to merge. Klbrain (talk) 21:21, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

@Klbrain: too complicated for me! Does that just involve reinstating the previous tags or do we have to start over? - Sitush (talk) 05:49, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

I've reopened it, by 'undoing' my last change on one of the pages, and adding the templates back on the other (which is simpler given the intervening edits). Klbrain (talk) 11:11, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Reversed my own opposition and completed the merge.   Y Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 09:04, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kharwar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161123041643/http://tribal.nic.in/WriteReadData/CMS/Documents/201212010356439267578File1068.pdf to http://tribal.nic.in/WriteReadData/CMS/Documents/201212010356439267578File1068.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:51, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Here the 'Desmari ' to be replaced by Deswari

Desmari to be replaced by Deswari 2409:4064:E03:2F32:0:0:BC8A:A011 (talk) 01:16, 5 November 2023 (UTC)