Talk:Khalid Mahmood (British politician)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Politics of the United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Birmingham Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Birmingham, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Birmingham on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BirminghamWikipedia:WikiProject BirminghamTemplate:WikiProject BirminghamBirmingham articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

West Midlands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject West Midlands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of West Midlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.West MidlandsWikipedia:WikiProject West MidlandsTemplate:WikiProject West MidlandsWest Midlands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

British Steel

DID MR MAHMOOD EVER WORK FOR BRITISH STEEL BROMFORD IN THE 80`S ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.36.52.59 (talk) 10:02, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mahmood

Mahmood was the surprise successor to Jeff Rooker as Labour Party candidate for Birmingham Perry Barr. There was concern locally that he received an unusually high large number of postal votes. His opponents inferred that the local Kashmiri/Pakistan community had been galvanised to support him. The national executive committee of the Labour Party decided against de-selecting him and no wrongdoing was ever proved. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Birmingham View (talk • contribs) 16:48, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image

There use to be an image on this article, File:KhalidMahmood.JPG, but it was removed here with a claim to be of the wrong person. As the image has remained un-used it has now been nominated for deletion. Anyone who can contribute is invited to do so at this discussion. --Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:54, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Voted strongly against

What does it mean that he voted "strongly for" or "very strongly against" something? MPs just vote aye or nay, there's no option for "strongly yes" or "very strongly no".Hobson (talk) 13:23, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Biography Link

Moved from main article as link broken.

The Labour Party - Khalid Mahmood MP official biography

RGCorris (talk) 16:33, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 December 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved per consensus and policy. To the points brought up by GreenCricket, the preference is article title disambiguation over hatnotes; and as to Bobby Martnen the proposed titles provide a clearer understanding of who these people were by identity (ie their role over their heritage). "British" was moved already, "Norwegian" is pending G6 to undo the bold move previously performed. (non-admin closure) Tiggerjay (talk) 21:50, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

– The purpose of a disambiguator is to provide a concise descriptor allowing the reader to distinguish between two topics. In this case, readers are much much much more likely to know the nationality of each of these politicians than to know their year of birth. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:07, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agree It's unlikely that even many members of the respective politicians' campaign teams can tell the difference between the two by date of birth. In the infrequent occasions in which years of birth are suitable disambiguators it's usually because differences of decades or centuries can unambiguously tell individuals apart Dtellett (talk) 17:37, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note The aricle currently at Khalid Mahmood (politician, born 1959) was in 2008 as Khalid Mahmood (Norwegian politician). It remained at that title for 7 years until was moved to its current title in a series of moves on 8 December 2015‎ ([1], [2], [3]) by User:GreenCricket. Since these good faith WP:BOLD moves were done without discussion, the stable version is Khalid Mahmood (Norwegian politician). If there is no consensus, the page should be moved by default back to that stable title. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:04, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree I have added hat note on each article which shows politician nationality...current format is more appropriate because it serves the purpose for long term GreenCricket (talk) 17:15, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply. Those hatnotes are superfluous, because the information contained in them duplicates the first line of the article.
  The guidance at WP:NCPDAB is "Years of birth and death are not normally used as disambiguators (readers are more likely to be seeking this information than to already know it) although this may be necessary when there are multiple people with the same name and tag." These two politicians are unambiguously distinguished by nationality, which is more informative to the reader.
  GreenCricket also refers to "long term" usage, which is a plea for pre-emptive disambiguation. It is long-standing practice that if any new articles create further ambiguity, then the disambiguation may be reconsidered ... but we do not pre-emptively disambiguate. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:45, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree - Both men are Pakistani, not British or Norwegian. Bobby Martnen (talk) 05:33, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply That argument is founded neither in fact nor in en.wp policy.
  Neither article makes any direct assertion of the citizenship of the two men. However, the purpose of a disambiguator is not to define legal status; it is to assist the reader in distinguishing the two articles. The date of birth fails that test, but the phrase "Fooian politician" does help the reader identify them. It also accords with the guideline WP:NCPDAB that a "disambiguator is usually a noun indicating what the person is noted for being in his or her own right".
  Each of those men has lived in their respective European countries for several decades since attending university there, and each has served as a member of the national parliament of that country. Regardless of any evidence of legal citizenship (and we have none), each man is readily identifiable as a politician of the country to whose parliament they were elected. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 07:53, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Obviously. Our usual practice is to use nationality as a disambiguator before we use year of birth, which should be a last resort only. Whatever the strict nationality of these gentlemen (and the British one has been in the UK since he was a child, so I'd be very surprised if he didn't have British nationality), being a member of a legislature makes "Foo politician" fine as a disambiguator. It's far more useful to anyone looking for them than their years of birth. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:40, 16 December 2015 (UTC)-- Necrothesp (talk) 16:40, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Why is this even an issue? The arguments against are facile. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:54, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support the move to have clear titles easy to distinguish. Peco Wikau (talk) 21:58, 17 December 2015 (UTC).[reply]
Support. Not obvious, because nationalities can be ambiguous, politicians have crossed national boundaries, but there appears no such hurdle here. Both are strongly associated with the respective stable nations, and the similar birth years does not disambiguate so usefully. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:59, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Khalid Mahmood (British politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.birmingham.gov.uk/general-election-2010
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130923022301/http://henryjacksonsociety.org/people/council-members/ to http://henryjacksonsociety.org/people/council-members/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:41, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]