Talk:Khagaul

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Khagaul article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

India: Bihar / Cities / Patna / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Bihar (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian cities (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Patna (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in March 2012.

Mandi365

In this city a group of farmers has founded a company which name is Mandi365 Pdtyagi007 (talk) 08:26, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The history section

It seems unsourced but going through language it's possible that it's not a complete hoax. I will try to find source. Admantine123 (talk) 10:48, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[1], this seems to be a mirror site of Wikipedia. It's also possible that the content here is copied from this website. I want the input of intersted editors on this. It's possible that some of the information of the history section is correct but it requires copyedit and removal of WP:Copyvio materials.Admantine123 (talk) 11:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

History section is overdominated by Info on Aryabhatta

History section is filled with excess information on Aryabhatta, which i cleaned but it was undone by @Admantine123:, Lets discuss why such a long thread on Aryabhatta is relevant to history section of khagaul. Lord 0f Avernus (talk) 11:26, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yup agree, but i am talking about nomenclature of khagaul, which is discussed there. It seems important. Admantine123 (talk) 11:29, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have much time on my hand these days, if you are interested, you can cleanup and shorten the section , without removing any relevant info. Otherwise i will get back to it at a later time. Thanks. Lord 0f Avernus (talk) 11:34, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]