Talk:Keynote (presentation software)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Keynote (presentation software) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Issue

I don't think the comparisons to MS Powerpoint are completely neutral. Any thoughts? Gs83 00:26, 24 January 2006 (UTC) The main problem with this article is that it compares an old version of keynote with an even older version of powerpoint. Powerpoint 2008 and Keynote 4 have been out for a while at this writing. And what about Google Presentation and Impress? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.79.199.124 (talk) 00:38, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed a possible POV contention. In the future, discuss the article on the talk page with other users BEFORE marking it as a POV, okay? --TangentIdea 04:10, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyvio?

The descriptions in the version history appear to have been copied directly from Apple's release notes. If so, this is a copyright violation. Can someone confirm this who has access to the original information? -- Steven Fisher

An Inconvenient Truth

Is this section really needed? It seems out of place.--roger6106 15:25, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Perhaps a "trivia and popular culture," something like that section should be added. ~~

I also agree. It's completely irrelevant. Edward assumed I was experimenting when I removed it; should've checked here. Anyways, another vote from me.--Jeff Wheeler 16:35, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What I guess I'm trying to say is that it is notable that a Keynote presentation has been made into a film. As far as I know this have never happened to a Powerpoint presentation. Edward 08:18, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New version sounds great. Jeff Wheeler 00:59, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Powerpoint

It would be helpful to know more about how this differs from Powerpoint.--roger6106 15:26, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RFD

This page does not meet criteria for a speedy delete under 11 or 12 of the guidelines. I believe there are more appropriate tags. Nja247 (talk • contribs) 17:29, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

There's a new article Keynote Remote, which I think would fit in nicely with this existing article. This iPhone app is not notable enough for its own article. No? Nja247 (talk • contribs) 07:22, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think Keynote Remote needs its own section in this article (as it now redirects here). Photographerguy (talk) 00:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate Advertising

How is a link to products that make Keynote better, inappropriate advertising?

You allow the promotion of the "remote" application for iPhone and Touch, sold by Apple for 99 cents.

How is that any different than letting people know through "External Links" that there are other great things out there to make their presentation lives easier. I can't see any difference other than your being in awe of Apple and treating others like garbage. But maybe someone can explain it.

I think you people should recognize you are here for information and the use of a little discretion in HELPING people is a good thing instead of looking for something that breaks a rule a little bit and pouncing. What are you communists? Having people interested in Keynote being made aware of KeynoteThemePark.com is a good thing. Or you better strip out any and all helpful Keynote products out of the article. Including those made by Apple. You even include a link to go and buy it. THAT is advertising, and by your definition inappropriate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.152.157.47 (talk) 18:48, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Keynote (presentation software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080517085355/http://developer.apple.com/documentation/AppleApplications/Conceptual/iWork2-0_XML/Chapter01/chapter_1_section_1.html to http://developer.apple.com/documentation/AppleApplications/Conceptual/iWork2-0_XML/Chapter01/chapter_1_section_1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:53, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Keynote (presentation software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140820214155/https://www.apple.com/quicktime/qtv/specialevent0110/ to https://www.apple.com/quicktime/qtv/specialevent0110/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110329021623/https://www.apple.com/pr/library/2005/jan/11iwork.html to https://www.apple.com/pr/library/2005/jan/11iwork.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110630082642/http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2009/01/06iwork.html to https://www.apple.com/pr/library/2009/01/06iwork.html
Corrected formatting/usage for https://support.apple.com/en-us/ht207247

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:59, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]