Talk:Kew Gardens station (London)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Stations / Rapid transit / in UK / in London Low‑importance

	Trains Portal

	London Transport Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject London Transport (assessed as Low-importance).

This article lacks references.

Possible renaming for this station due to a disused railway station on Merseyside (see here) with the same name? (Stuey 182 13:33, 13 April 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Duly renamed and disambiguated -- Chris j wood

Is it "one of the last" illuminated banner repeater signals on the London Underground or "THE last" - can anyone tell me? Zir 14:12, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article needs additional citations

This article is full of fascinating facts about the history of transport in West London. If only the original editors had taken a moment to cite their sources, e.g.

Proposal that Crossrail line 1 will call here in [this version] by User:OwenBlacker
Date of Construction and first services in [this version] by User:ChrisO.
Opening date, "area of market gardens and orchards", history of line including curve section and Grove Road station, former service from Paddington to Richmond, and reference to Ravenscourt Park extension in [this version] by User:DavidCane

I'm not trying to be picky, it is just frustrating that these three highly experienced wikipedians have such useful source information up their sleeves that I would love to read in the original. Sigh - Pointillist (talk) 21:55, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No reply for six weeks, so I've asked Slambo (the admin who originally rated this article B-class on Sept 26, 2007) whether it can be down-rated for lack of verifiability. - Pointillist (talk) 21:57, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

C seems reasonable to me for this article right now. In future, when there is no response for a while, it can often be taken as tacit agreement. When I don't see a response to a message for a few days, I put my own response saying something like "okay, seeing no response, I'm going to do it." Slambo (Speak) 14:20, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. Of course, what I really wanted to see was the source info - it doesn't give me any pleasure to down-rate an article. - Pointillist (talk) 16:52, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Refs added. Sorry I hadn't seen your request for citations, I have a lot of articles in my watch list. Having identified a specific user that you wish to respond, the best way to get a response is to leave a note on their talk page. As lack of refs was the reason to downgrade I will restore it to B status.--DavidCane (talk) 22:31, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DavidCane, many thanks for the references: I've just taken a quick look and I'm looking forward to exploring them in detail. Much appreciated - Pointillist (talk) 22:43, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Photos

I've reinstated a couple of photos recently removed by Sunil060902 - none of the new ones feature any trains. I know service on this branch can be intermittent at times but it's not that bad ...Zir (talk) 21:35, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, this article is about the station not the trains, and the older photos are out of date, since D-stock is refurbished with all-red front-end, and 313 units are no longer operated by Silverlink. If you care to check, plenty of station articles lack pics of trains, so this is not the only one! best, Sunil060902 (talk) 11:49, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signage for station name

The signage for the station name is in caps as opposed to the next station on the line, Gunnersbury, where signage is in upper and lower case. Is there a logical explanation for this?Headhitter (talk) 13:46, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe TfL re-signed it in LU style (because of the District Line presence) not realising that it's NR-owned. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:49, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kew Gardens station (London). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120816124750/https://urbandesign.tfl.gov.uk/Heritage-Library/Underground/KewGardens-Station-Footbridge.aspx to http://urbandesign.tfl.gov.uk/Heritage-Library/Underground/KewGardens-Station-Footbridge.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:22, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]