Jump to content

Talk:Kevin O'Halloran/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Old comments

This sentence is ambiguous. "In 1958, his parents drove all the way to Sydney to swim at the Australian Championships, but a recurring ear infection stopped him from performing at his peak." Surely his parents didn't go to swim. Could it be changed in some way, e.g. "In 1958, his parents drove all the way to Sydney to watch him swim at the Australian Championships, but a recurring ear infection stopped him from performing at his peak." to make it clearer?

Done Britmax 22:51, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Good Aritlce - On Hold

A good article has the following attributes:

  1. It is well written. In this respect:
    (a) the prose is clear and the spelling and grammar are correct; and
    (b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, jargon, words to avoid, fiction, and list incorporation.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable. In this respect, it:
    (a) provides references to all sources of information, and at minimum contains a section dedicated to the attribution of those sources in accordance withhttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Kevin_O%27Halloran&action=edit&section=1

edit the guide to layout;

  1. (b) at minimum, provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons; and
    (c) contains no original research.
  2. It is broad in its coverage. In this respect, it:
    (a) addresses the major aspects of the topic; and
    (b) stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary details (see summary style).
  3. It is neutral; that is, it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias.
  4. It is stable; that is, it does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of an ongoing edit war. Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply.
  5. It is illustrated, where possible and appropriate, by images. In this respect:
    (a) images used are tagged with their copyright status, and fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
    (b) the images are appropriate to the topic, and have suitable captions.

- Milk's Favorite Cookie 15:34, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you mean with the refs. Can you clarify this? I looked at section one and every paragraph has a ref. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:01, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
As for the images, I don't think there are any acceptable images. The only pictures of him in the books are in 1956, posing with his medal, but {{PD-Australia}} only works for pre-1955 work. Fair use wouldn't cover it because the picture doesn't show anything unusual or flamboyant that would make the article hard to fathom without pictorial help. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:01, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Ok Looks good. You would require a better variety of references, that are actually verifiable. An internet website for example. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 02:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
erm, I'm afraid that since this is an Olympic year, the Australian Olympic Committee has revamped their website, and as a result, their athlete database has gone offline. If you look at Australian Olympic medalists in swimming, the link to his database entry is no longer there. However, the book records contain info not available online ever. I'm not sure what I can do for you. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:34, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Hmmm.... I'm going to ask for a second opinion. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 02:36, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
*cue second opinion* Using different medium of sources (specifically, internet sources) has never been a requirement for GA. People are actually encouraged to use book references, when applicable. This is one of those situations. I can personally vouch for Blnguyen's reliability, as he has written almost 40 GA/A/FA level articles using accurate book references. Nishkid64 (talk) 02:38, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Successful good article nomination

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of February 20, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Pass
2. Factually accurate?: Pass
3. Broad in coverage?: Pass
4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
5. Article stability? Pass
6. Images?: Pass
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.- Milk's Favorite Cookie 23:48, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

No picture?

This is the FA and it doesn't even have a picture? What's going on here? Nwhit (talk) 01:08, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

An article doesn't need to have a picture to be considered a FA article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.160.155.102 (talk) 01:50, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Suicide?

I'm reading an article I kept from the Weekend Australian Magazine of 21-22 August 2004, where Richard Zachariah writes an extended piece on Murray Rose, including material from an interview. In it, he says quite unequivocally that Kevin O'Halloran and Murray Garretty both suicided.

Quote: Kevin O'Halloran suffered through crippling bouts of depression before shooting himself on his Western Australian property in 1976, aged 39; and Murray Garretty ... killed himself in the early 1970s.

Later: Reflecting on the suicides of O'Halloran and Garretty, Rose says he never underestimated the price of excellence. "One of the things that was linked to Kevin's death was that he always wanted to do well in individual events at the Olympics, and never achieved that. In Garretty's case, like Mark Spitz, there was an awful lot of pressure from his father. The emphasis was always on winning rather than personal best.

So, what do we make of this? I've looked for corroboration but have drawn a blank so far. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 04:00, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kevin O'Halloran. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:28, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Kevin_O%27Halloran/Archive_1&oldid=1251843873"