Talk:Kevin Martin (curler)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 11:02, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Before I start reviewing, please cite every paragraph in the career section.

   The lead is a little bit short. Has he set any records? Was he included in a "Curling Hall of Fame"?

   This article has a strong potential to be promoted, and I am happy to see the first GA about a curler, but it needs some work in referencing, so I am putting this on hold before I resume.

   Are the additions made adequate? Thanks! Prayerfortheworld (talk) 04:36, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

   The prose is very good

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   All references should contain the publisher and the accessdate

   References are otherwise reliable

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall: Very nice article! --GoP_T^C_N 11:22, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

   Pass/Fail: