Talk:Kevin Dooley

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Comics: Creators / United States Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by Comics creators work group.
	This article is supported by United States comics work group.

This article has been marked as requiring an image. Please add one in accordance with guidance.

Green Lantern

Green Lantern had become stale and boring, despite the fact that the Green Lantern comics were best-sellers before he became the editor, after which the quality and sales began plummeting

This particular line is at odds with the Emerald Twilight write-up:

The editorial decision to shake up the Green Lantern series was eventually justified by revitalized sales and critical acclaim for the series.

So, which is it? Or, given the sheer animosity that Silver-age Green Lantern fans hold towards Dooley, is it even known one way or another? 156.34.221.174 17:54, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hal Jordan fans were the least of Dooley's troubles as an editor; his lack of competency is well-documented and, frankly, puzzling. Yet you have a good point. Claims about circulation numbers should at the very least have some clear source, so I am changing the article. Luis Dantas 10:40, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]