Talk:Keshdhari Hindus

This article was nominated for deletion on 27 January 2016. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Sikhism

This article is part of WikiProject Sikhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Sikhism. Please participate by editing the article, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.

Guidelines: Manual of Style - Naming conventionsSikhismWikipedia:WikiProject SikhismTemplate:WikiProject SikhismSikhism articles

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed deletion

@KarantSingh: You should not delete the proposed deletion notice unless the reason stated is invalid. You need to state here why you think it is invalid.

Only notable topics can have articles on Wikipedia. A topic is considered notable if it has at least two reliable sources. Since the topic of this article is a name, you need to find two reliable sources that directly discuss the name. If you have them, please mention them here. - Kautilya3 (talk) 09:46, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Kautilya3: All sources which i referring too are reliable which includes Newspaper Citations, Book Citations and Citation of High authority of Sikhs. Could you provide me link to discussion page for the article preventing deletion. Till i add more book such references. (Karantsingh (talk) 09:58, 20 January 2016 (UTC))[reply]

The sources you have in the article merely report that X used the term and Y contested it. They do not discuss the term itself. You need sources that discuss the term in depth. - Kautilya3 (talk) 10:04, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A full fledged branch of major organization got excommunicated by major supreme authority of community, due to this term. The sources are reliable enough and have enough description on background, meaning and even results of using term. I don't understand what kind of sources are you looking for? or do you think topic should have another name? (Karantsingh (talk) 10:27, 25 January 2016 (UTC))[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Keshdhari Hindus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080226232713/http://www.wou.edu/~khes/geog451/hindu_violence.pdf to http://www.wou.edu/~khes/geog451/hindu_violence.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:59, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]