Jump to content

Talk:Keren Woodward

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Woodward and Ridgely

[edit]

Keren and Andrew have never married!!! It is a fallacy to state he is her husband. Keren has often stated on various websites and publications that they will probably never marry as they don't see the point. Please don't revert!

Whilst I agree with your point, if you could specifically quote your sources, this would add much more weight to your argument. Equally, please sing your comments with four tildes (as below) for ease of identification / response etc. Thanks,
Derek R Bullamore 00:37, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As stated before, Woodward and Ridgely have never married. The VH1 article quoted as a source is erroneous - it also states they have a son, which is not the case as it is common knowledge that Keren's son is from her previous relationship.Paul75 00:51, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fine - but, as before, have you got a citeable source?
Derek R Bullamore (talk) 21:28, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

96.251.63.230 (talk) 12:22, 21 October 2012 (UTC)apparently all that matters is a source. facts and the truth don't matter on wikipedia[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Keren Woodward. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:35, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"See Also" section

[edit]

There is a huge list of about 25 named individuals linked under the "See also" section. They don't seem to be listed in any particular order or grouping and without clicking through to each individual entry there is absolutely no context as to why they are relevant to the Keren Woodward article. --Lost tourist (Talk) 09:27, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, having now clicked through a few of them, they all seem to be links to US politicians. I strongly suspect this section is spam and will be removing it. --Lost tourist (Talk) 09:28, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]