Talk:Kept woman

This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was redirect to mistress (lover).

This in no way matches the A1 or A3 criteria, because:

1) It provides sufficient context for expansion 2) Doesn't match the "contains no content whatsoever" criteria 3) Doesn't consist only of links 4) Is not just a re-phrasing of the title

Dicdef is not a speedy deletion criteria
A similar article has been deleted before, but this should not be deleted unless it is considered that the original deletion matched the criteria (which I would respond the same as above)

Trevor Saline 08:06, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Why are you creating articles like this when you've been asked not to? Even if this isn't a candidate for a speedy, I doubt strongly it would survive an AfD. Is there any point in dragging us through the process? I think it's great that you'd like to add to Wikipedia, but I think your energies could be more productively applied. Thanks, William Pietri 10:34, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Concept is valid

The concept of "kept person" (man or woman) does need to be documented - if not under "Kept woman", then under what entry? Samatva 21:13, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]