Talk:Kepler-9d

Kepler-9d has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Kepler-9d is part of the Kepler-9 series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 21, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed
May 11, 2011	Good topic candidate	Promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 27, 2011.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the small extrasolar planet Kepler-9d orbits its host star every 1.59 days?

Current status: Good article

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Kepler-9d/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 22:23, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:24, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Well written, I made a few minor copy-edits
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Sources check out, RS, no OR
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
AS much as is known at present about an object 650 parsecs away.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
None used, though images such as those in 9b & 9c would be good. Not a GA criteria.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
OK, good to go -careful taht you don't run out of exoplanets! :-) Jezhotwells (talk) 22:38, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kepler-9d. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110505000325/http://exoplanet.eu/papers/Kepler-9-d.pdf to http://exoplanet.eu/papers/Kepler-9-d.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:51, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]