Talk:Kepler-9c
Kepler-9c has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Kepler-9c is part of the Kepler-9 series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Image
[edit]Although the text states that the planet is about 15% the size of Jupiter, looking at the image in the infobox one gets the impression that it's only 15% smaller, which is a different thing. Could somebody with more knowledge than me about this check this please (before it goes active on DYK preferably). --Crusio (talk) 00:17, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
You are correct. The page author confused Kepler 9-c with Kepler 9-d. JEH (talk) 18:23, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
- I have to be more careful. I will be in the future. --Starstriker7(Talk) 05:46, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Orbit Shortening
[edit]The periodical variations are oscillatory, as stated even in the MSNBC article. That means the shortening of the orbital period will eventually be reversed. I clarified some of the statements which unfortunately had already found their way onto the Main Page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.44.40.236 (talk) 19:19, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
- As the article currently stands, the "stable orbit" is shortened by 39 minutes each "year", with no oscillation mentioned.--Wetman (talk) 20:49, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Kepler-9c. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110103072601/http://exoplanet.eu/star.php?st=Kepler-9 to http://exoplanet.eu/star.php?st=Kepler-9
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110108114026/http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2010/08/26/4974937-planets-spotted-in-changing-orbits to http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2010/08/26/4974937-planets-spotted-in-changing-orbits
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:29, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Natural sciences good articles
- GA-Class Featured topics articles
- Wikipedia featured topics Kepler-9 good content
- Low-importance Featured topics articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles
- GA-Class Astronomy articles
- Low-importance Astronomy articles
- GA-Class Astronomy articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class Astronomical objects articles
- Pages within the scope of WikiProject Astronomical objects (WP Astronomy Banner)