Talk:Kepler-9/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 17:12, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: the link to KOI-377.03 redirects back to this article so, you should de-link KOI-377.03. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:14, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Linkrot:

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Complies sufficiently, I made one minor copy-edit

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Ref #1[1] failed verification. The information may be elsewhere on this site.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   As broad as is reasonable given this is a recent discovery.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Suitable rationale and caption

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Just one reference needs fixing. On Hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:29, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

   I have resolved all the pointers you've brought up. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 05:28, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

   Well done, I just couldn't find that on the site, but imagined that it would be there. I am now happy to list this as a good article. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 09:11, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

   Thank you very much. :D --Starstriker7^(Talk) 01:39, 10 February 2011 (UTC)