Talk:Kepler-8b
 | Kepler-8b has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kepler-8b article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Kepler-8b/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 17:38, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: two found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 17:46, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:48, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Sources check out, RS, no OR
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- As much detail as is currently available about an object so far away. Undoubtedly there will be more information in time.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Tagged and captioned.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- I have no hesitation in listing this. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 18:04, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
