Talk:Kepler-56

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Kepler-56d was copied or moved into Kepler-56 with this edit on 17 April 2014. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Comments

Gang of gas giants may have tilted distant planet system New Scientist 31 August 2016

Now, after analysing four years of Kepler-56 observations, Justin Otor at Princeton University and his colleagues conclude that the culprit is probably an even more massive unseen planet. With at least 5.6 times Jupiter’s mass, it is tugging on its companions from an orbit much further out. Where the misaligned planets are closer to their sun than Mercury is to ours, the new planet would be just beyond Mars if part of our solar system. The object orbits every 2.74 years.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomruen (talk • contribs) 23:33, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kepler-56. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131019123559/http://www.openexoplanetcatalogue.com/system.html?id=Kepler-56 to http://www.openexoplanetcatalogue.com/system.html?id=Kepler-56

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:50, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]