Talk:Kepler-138

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedy deleted as having no substantive content, because I have now uploaded significant content (please see the page for evidence of this).

Naming again

I agree with the above, the star's name can be referred to as either "KOI" or "Kepler" and both of these naming designations were created by the Kepler Team, not the discoverers of the first two confirmed planets. I agree these authors did not discover the star as the previous post remarks; however, neither did the Kepler Team, since the star previously had a 2MASS name anyway. In any case, the issue of the star's name does not seem relevant. The IAU naming system referenced in the article is specifically for planets names, not stars. Those rules describe that any new name for a *planet* must be agreed upon by the original discoverers of the *planet*. So the discoverers of the first two planets could have called them whatever they wanted, it just so happens they chose to name them after the KOI star name. Accordingly, any name change for the planets would need approval by this original team, but the star's name is a different issue altogether (and also confusing). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Denislemenoir (talk • contribs) 23:14, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kepler-138. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:25, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kepler-138. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140213051553/http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/HEK/ to http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/HEK/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:47, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]