Jump to content

Talk:Kenzer & Company

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

I put a request for expansion for this article on July 14th, 2005.--Azathar 15:36, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]


What part of this article needs to be referenced further to have the "Unreferenced" tag removed. I'll gladly do the research needed but I need to know what required research needs to be done. --Greylond —Preceding unsigned comment added by Greylond (talkcontribs) 17:08, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the tag mentions that there's no references, so anything should do. However, to avoid any doubts about the notability of K&C, find a good third-party article talking about them, and add references based on what they say (even adding appropriate content based on the article to do so). However, I also note that the second paragraph starting with "They are known for..." would be a great place to provide references. Show that they are known for these titles. --Rindis (talk) 22:01, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Doing a search in an attempt to prove Kenzer's notability: I've found the following reference, an article about the release of the 4th Edition verision of Kingdoms of Kalmar that I think proves notability - but I'm not entirely sure how or where to edit it into the text (this being my first main space edit) [1].

I also found the following on a Monty Python fansite, which can stand as a source on the Python card game: [2]

I also found this [3] which appears to be a direct copy of the wikipedia article (even down to the use of the stub template) - do we know if they have the right permissions/licences? I couldn't tell.

And that's just the stuff on the first three pages that wasn't from blogs or online bookshops. NullofWest (talk) 16:27, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've now added the refernce for the Monty Python game to the main article NullofWest (talk) 16:36, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'm going to be bold and add as a new section. I think there's probably still concerns around refernces, but until I can dig up some more I'm going to downgraded the template to the "More References" from the current "No References". NullofWest (talk) 20:49, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]