Talk:Kentucky Fried Cruelty

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Girlieness2323.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Untitled

I read this article and it is completely pro PETA and anti-KFC. Someone with more knowledge about this subject should re-edit it. Please. 12.206.8.200 (talk) 19:38, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

I partly agree. The main problem in constructing a more balanced article is KFC don't issue proper statements, stating their polices of animal welfare etc. There is PETA's video and their claims but not much else. Not enough people care about what's going on so why should KFC? 88.105.103.119 (talk) 13:17, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

I agree also. Just read the opening sentance: "...however, nearly two years later, on January 6, 2003, it turned out that KFC lied..." --Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.45.204.136 (talk) 21:43, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

This was truly terrible writing. Ye gods. How did this not get nuked solely on this account? I've done the best that I can to make it presentable, but it's still dreadful. I'd have expected better writing from a tabloid... 35.9.23.82 (talk) 14:52, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

I am striking the section describing Pamela Anderson's video: How is she relevant to this? Additionally, the (uncited) accusations made in this subsection are already covered in the rest of the article. Rebbing (talk) 17:11, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

I have a problem with this unsourced statement:

[H]owever, nearly two years later, on January 6, 2003, it turned out that KFC lied

Rebbing (talk) 05:58, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Completely agree, this article is completely pro-PETA and I agree with TeeRebel below, it should be merged with the main PETA article rather than be an article in itself

Notability

I added a notability template to the article. IMHO, the subject isn't notable enough to have its own page. As it is obviously of interest, I feel it should instead be merged with the main PETA article. --Preceding unsigned comment added by TeeRebel (talk o contribs) 04:33, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

I disagree about merging this with the PETA article since that article has been subject to removal of much info due to bloating. However, I agree that this could be merged with the existing Kentucky Fried Cruelty campaign page, since both are small. Bob98133 (talk) 13:48, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Then I will merge the two KFC Cruelty articles. Akhran (talk) 23:16, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kentucky Fried Cruelty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070415014949/http://www.kentuckyfriedcruelty.com:80/whatsinaname.asp to http://www.kentuckyfriedcruelty.com/whatsinaname.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:04, 24 January 2016 (UTC)