Talk:Kent Cochrane/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: WhatamIdoing (talk) 18:30, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article was significantly improved as part of a university class program. I have begun by marking a couple of sentences that require WP:Inline citations to meet the WP:Good article criteria. Generally, speaking, any time you give a statistic or say that a study came to a conclusion, it is best to provide a citation that supports this. The citation can either name the study itself or any reliable source that talks about the study.

In terms of other criteria, there are minor grammar and style problems that may be quicker to fix than to explain. However, I believe that it fails 1(b) for having a too-brief lead section.

I have not investigated whether the named sources properly support the material they are supposed to, but I generally expect that this point will be fine or require only minor changes. The quality of sources named is generally quite good.

The article appears to be broad in coverage, properly focused on its topic, neutral, and stable. The image license is appropriate.

It's not clear whether anyone is active at this article. If so, I'd appreciate hearing from you sometime in the next few days. WhatamIdoing (talk) 18:30, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As the article does not meet the criteria at this time, and it appears that no one is available to make the necessary improvements, I will close this as not listed. Anyone may re-nominate it in the future. WhatamIdoing (talk) 15:11, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]