Talk:Kenshiro Abbe/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 13:03, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I am reviewing this article. The main problem is a dead link that unfortunately is used very frequently (47 times) as a reference.[1] Once the problem is taken care of, I will review the rest of the article. I have made some copy edits to ensure prose quality and compliance with the MoS. Regards, Xtzou (Talk) 13:03, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
- The Morgan and Ellis (2006) link, which you had tagged, appears to be working normally. The IBC UK (2007) reference appeared as a dead link but I have checked and updated it, so all reference links appear to be functioning. Janggeom (talk) 13:28, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality: Well written
- B. MoS compliance: Complies with required elements of MOS
- A. Prose quality: Well written
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources: Reliable sources
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: Well referenced
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources: Reliable sources
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects: Sets the context
- B. Focused: Remains focused on the topic
- A. Major aspects: Sets the context
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail: Pass!
- Pass or Fail: Pass!
Congratulations! Xtzou (Talk) 14:15, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for your (exceptionally speedy) review. Janggeom (talk) 14:20, 6 June 2010 (UTC)