Talk:Kenneth L. Davis

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This article seems highly complimentary to the point of sounding like a CV. I am not familiar with the individual or the field, but it seems like there may be an NPOV issue. chrylis (talk) 03:55, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There may be a hagiographic word or two, but the material seems pretty well sourced. What your complaint about the spelling or grammar is, I have no idea. I looked the article over carefully but can't find any spelling or grammar errors. If you can't be more clear, I will remove your tag. AFGO (talk) 13:23, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are some minor punctuation errors and WP:STYLE issues I didn't have time to correct. As for the sourcing, that's why I tagged it NPOV and not autobiography; it sounds like there may be more to the story, but everything that is said seems to be reasonably accurate. --chrylis (talk) 16:07, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that there were some hagiographic clauses; I have removed them. I hope this takes care of the NPOV dispute, as the rest of the material seems very well sourced (and the topic is relevant to Alzheimer's research and is worthy).

I made a couple of punctuation changes. Other than that, I cannot find anything that would warrant the copy editing tag. I've certainly spent a lot of time correcting glaring style mistakes all over Wikipedia; this article's offenses (if any) don't seem to warrant a tag that seems to call the whole article into question, as it's difficult to argue that it's not at least clear. Patricia Meadows (talk) 14:45, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. As Chrylis hasn't responded in a few days, I'll assume this dispute is resolved and remove the tags. Leonard Finger (talk) 17:06, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The current revision has taken care of the concerns I had; I'm fine with the tag removal and am now unwatching. --chrylis (talk) 18:35, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Berger?

I deleted a paragraph added by Truthsiani that was about someone named Dr. Berger that was unsourced and didn't belong on the Davis page. Perhaps someone should create a page for Dr. Berger? Patricia Meadows (talk) 13:04, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]