This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot14:15, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article is replete with strong bias and needs to be completely redone in a similar manner to the articles on the other politicians in St. Kitts and Nevis history in which only the bare facts are stated, accompanied by bare skeleton information on one or two main achievements and one or two problems faced by his administration. The current article is unacceptable by too many wikipedia standards to count (Not organized into sections, no side bar with date of birth laid out, one-sided article, biography-style article in narrative form, NO SOURCES OF INFORMATION, and generally poorly written.) As with most political articles, it also bitterly attacks the main opposing party with strong allegations which lack sources. As stated earlier, it needs to be completely removed and completely redone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jensonmorton (talk • contribs) 05:57, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]