Talk:Kennedy Meeks

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

College basketball Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject College basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College basketballWikipedia:WikiProject College basketballTemplate:WikiProject College basketballcollege basketball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Meeks picture

The picture of Kennedy Meeks is being removed repeatedly, but I see nothing wrong with it. The edit summary stated Meeks requested it to be removed, but Wikipedia is not censored, and the subject of the article does not get to dictate what is written about him. Are there any policy-based reasons for removing the picture? Of course, if a higher quality picture exists, feel free to edit that one into the article instead; there's just no reason to remove a perfectly good picture and leave nothing. ~ Rob^Talk 15:34, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A replacement image that was added has been removed while it is under discussion at Wikipedia:Non-free_content_review#File:Kennedy_Meeks_against_Louisville.2C_Jan_31.2C_2015.gif. —Bagumba (talk) 18:20, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And since it flagrantly violates our non-free policy I have deleted it. If the subject wants to provide a new image with a Wikipedia-compatible license, that would be the best thing all round. Black Kite (talk) 18:38, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

With the caveat that it must be better than the one already in use, of course. No selfies, please. ~ Rob^Talk 18:59, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kennedy Meeks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150425010314/http://www.theacc.com/news/acsma-all-acc-basketball-teams-announced-03-08-2015 to http://www.theacc.com/news/acsma-all-acc-basketball-teams-announced-03-08-2015

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:30, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]