Talk:Ken Medema

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Disability

Ken Medema is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

2019 error message lack of inline citations

Recently performed research (Dec 2019) indicates that the only information available has been put out either directly by the artist himself or indirectly through that of his own publicity and promotions team. As such - it seems kind of pointless to have the same three or four ILCs to either his webpage or his own promo packets as they appeared in other publications repeated over and over.

For example: his university records and the publications associated therewith (school papers, school magazines etc) along with other local sources, (concert programs, television coverage, religious organizations and other `friendly' sources etc) all pretty much say exactly what's reported here.

For more recent news, again, the same applies. There is very little independent coverage of the artist. Mostly venues and publications for which either he/his team paid or for which the source was paid by a related person or legal entity (religious organization, concert promotions team etc).

So there's not much else to go on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.218.36.228 (talk) 02:59, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality

If this article is to survive, it needs to be written with a more neutral tone. As it is now, it almost seems like a brochure for the subject. This was clearly written by a fan. -- Mufka ^(user) ^(talk) ^(contribs) 19:27, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

external links

The external links are cluttered with links to youtube videos of the artist. I believe a removal of these is necessary however, if I'm wrong, feel free to revert my edit. Charbon (talk) 07:24, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ken Medema. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928080638/http://www.baptiststandard.com/2001/4_23/pages/medema.html to http://www.baptiststandard.com/2001/4_23/pages/medema.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:51, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]