Talk:Ken Evoy

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Marketing & Advertising Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Montreal Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montreal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Montreal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontrealWikipedia:WikiProject MontrealTemplate:WikiProject MontrealMontreal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 January 2007. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Untitled

http://graphics.sitesell.com/other_graphics/toys_globe_article_supp.jpg

http://graphics.sitesell.com/other_graphics/toys_gazette_article_supp.gif

In addition to a more recent set of interviews on CJAD 800 AM's Peter Anthony Holder Show (Holder Overnight)...

http://www.cjad.com/

...this makes the SiteSell article both "verifiable" and "neutral" based on the Notability criteria...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability

This page has already been deleted and its history removed. I contest, based on the above (which covers both this article on the person as well as the person's company - Sitesell) that it be readded.Maltiti 01:36, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can't comment on whether or not this page should have been deleted, but this is not the correct way to go about restoring it. I would contact and admin, such as User:The Epopt, and ask them to restore the page to your subpage, and ask them to take a look and tell you what was wrong with it, if anything. Thedreamdied 01:56, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From SiteSell Corporate

Please see...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ronz#Regarding_SiteSell_Corporate_username

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Akradecki#Regarding_Ken_Evoy

We seem to have caused a great deal of consternation by intuitively registering as SiteSell_Corporate, openly revealing potential COI. If you review the history of that edit, you will see it was objective, early years' material. We didn't know it was necessary to "register" and it seemed to us that if someone wanted to be clandestine, he would do so. And if not, why not just register with an openly obvious username? Sorry for violating the rules, there are just so many of them.

Subsequent edits (after ours, up to today) have made the article better, and we will leave you with our suggestions in the above two URLs. The article was sent to Ken Evoy, who has confirmed it is accurate, with the recommendations made in our talk at the above two URLs.

But from now on, he suggested that we should stay out it. We have never posted to "Ken Evoy" before, only one edit was made (an objective one). So can you please remove the COI designation?

Thanks very much SiteSell Corporate 17:33, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ken Evoy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071214074638/http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/story.html?id=a77d249d-0ae4-491b-827e-cb478d976bae&k=52575 to http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/story.html?id=a77d249d-0ae4-491b-827e-cb478d976bae&k=52575

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:09, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]