Talk:Kelvedon and Tollesbury Light Railway

East Anglia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

Kelvedon, Tiptree & Tollesbury Pier Light Railway

According to Butt, R. V. J. (October 1995). The Directory of Railway Stations: details every public and private passenger station, halt, platform and stopping place, past and present (1st ed.). Sparkford: Patrick Stephens Ltd. pp. 129, 291. ISBN 978-1-85260-508-7. OCLC 60251199. OL 11956311M. this line/company had the name "Kelvedon, Tiptree & Tollesbury Pier Light Railway".

A websearch shows many other sources offering the same information.

Efficacy (talk) 20:41, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment, but I'm afraid I can't agree, for a number of reasons. Butt is extremely slapdash over accuracy, and I never feel able to rely on him. If you look at Paye's book, page 17, Paye reproduces the Light Railway Order. There's no "Pier" in it, which I suggest is pretty conclusive. When the Pier extension was authorised, that was by means of a general-purpose GER Act, which did not change the name of the line; by then of course it was just a branch of the GER and didn't need a company title. I tried google for the "Pier" title but three pages of results didn't return anything relevant. Quick's book is much more reliable than Butt, chiefly because it it subject to continuous peer review -- a new edition is coming out in two or three months with some updates. He deosn't mention the Pier. Carter doesn't quote the Pier, although I concede that Carter is not free of error; and finally Grant doesn't use the "Pier". But thanks for the comment; I can't speak for others but I would always rather have something queried than not. Regards Afterbrunel (talk) 16:03, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kelvedon and Tollesbury Light Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070727141413/http://www.tiptree.com/family_history.php to http://www.tiptree.com/family_history.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:04, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]