This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
@Jarekt: a couple of things. Firstly, the merge template should go on the article page not on the talk page (I've moved it). Secondly, could you added a case for a merge here? I'd be tempted to keep them separate, given that they are different techniques. Why do you think that they should be on the same page? Klbrain (talk) 22:32, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I just created an article stump for Stereochromy which is mentioned here an there but never defined. Art history is not my field but from what I can figure out Stereochromy is an old name for Mineral_painting which is a process devised by Keim to improve improve Stereochromy. And when I linked to Adolf Wilhelm Keim I found article about Keim's process which sounds like what others called Mineral_painting. So we have 3 concepts: Stereochromy, Mineral_painting and Keim's process, if you think those are different techniques than maybe we should have article about original Stereochromy and this article should mention that others call it Mineral_painting. But as I said I do not know much about the topic and was only trying to interpret sources. --Jarekt (talk) 01:52, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OK; on a second look, it does seems reasonable to discuss them all in one place, particularly given how short the current articles are. So, YMerger complete.Klbrain (talk) 07:39, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]