Jump to content

Talk:Keiko Fujimori

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Comments

[edit]

I have removed material from this article that does not comply with our policy on the biographies of living persons. Biographical material must always be referenced from reliable sources, especially negative material. Negative material that does not comply with that must be immediately removed. Note that the removal does not imply that the information is either true or false.

Please do not reinsert this material unless you can provide reliable citations, and can ensure it is written in a neutral tone. Please review the relevant policies before editing in this regard. Editors should note that failure to follow this policy may result in the removal of editing privileges.--Docg 23:54, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous or biased information

[edit]

Saying that Fujimori "stripped" his wife of the title of First Lady is ambiguous at best and misleading at worst (in that it sounds egomaniacal, or cruel). Susana Higuchi divorced Alberto Fujimori (for reasons of irreconcilable differences), and thereafter Fujimori named his daughter First Lady. I believe, though I can't remember specific examples, that this is standard practice in the case of divorced/widowed presidents. Can someone complete this information? 70.171.231.243 (talk) 18:40, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look. SamEV (talk) 02:58, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
According to Susana Higuchi's page, the divorce happened in 1998. Keiko Fujimori became first lady in 1994, while his parents were still officially married. So this change of first ladies was not 'standard practice'. President Fujimori announced his decision in a public address broadcast by almost all major TV stations. Now, whether the term 'stripped' is appropriate or not, in The Free Dictionary, I've found the following definition for this word: " To deprive of honors, rank, office, privileges, or possessions; divest." (http://www.thefreedictionary.com/stripped) In conclusion, the term is stripped would be accurate in the case of Keiko's mother. Now, whether President Fujimori had the right to do this, that's a completely different discussion. Cheers. --W1k1w4lt3r (talk) 05:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BLPN discussion

[edit]
There's a discussion about this article at the BLP Noticeboard.Anythingyouwant (talk) 04:49, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
And right back at it again. Please more than a 10 minute block.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 17:28, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

[edit]

The following paragraph is not written in an encyclopedic manner and may not be from a NPOV:

As a congresswoman and leader of the political party, Keiko has defended the reforms executed by her father during the nineties. She has led a responsible opposition to the current government, and has presented important laws. For instance, she passed a law to cut down the taxes to public entertainment events, thus allowing many international artists to perform in Peru. She authored a law that restricts penitentiary benefits for those who commit serious offenses, and she also authored an additional law that obligates judges to give the highest sanctions to repeat offenders. Similarly, she passed a law that reduces the jail benefits to those who are protected under the so-called ‘sincere confession’. Along with the Fujimorista congress members, she is currently working on a project law in which death penalty would also be applicable to some of the most severe crimes.

-LegalSkeptic (talk) 17:00, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the following sentece because it did not express a neutral point of view and it did not include a source:

She is the heiress to a fortune estimated to be close to $1.2 billion proceeding from the corruption in the government of former Peruvian President Alberto Fujimori[citation needed].

-jjhong89 (talk) 13:51, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a fan of this article either. I have no dog in this hunt, don't care about their election, but it's as if someone started/worked on this as PR, and someone else threw in "funded by dirty money" based on a single article that just threw out the epithet in the headline. This article looks like a mess of POV. I'd fix it if I were a regular editor or if I particularly cared about Fujimori or her opponents. but as a reader just looking for information, I don't think this is the place to start looking for more about these people if I want just the facts. I did make some very minor formatting corrections, but I don't want to be bothered becoming a semi-expert on Peruvian politics to fix this article. 99.107.159.25 (talk) 22:36, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted 2 changes to remove a quote recently added that was not in the cited link and I could not find in Google (a reminder than when it never hurts to check sources...), and to remove some POV / biased language in the intro. It might even be a good idea to lock this article to return it to good Wikipedia NPOV standards. Gjetost (talk) 13:04, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Keiko Fujimori. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:13, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Keiko Fujimori. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:41, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:46, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image with permission

[edit]

I reached out to find evidence for an image and I got an answer from Flickr. If anyone would like to look here then you will see that they grant permission and suggest that they could comply with a request for proof of permission. Victuallers (talk) 16:55, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Victuallers: I believe the evidence that you are citing is for this photo which has already been deleted. I uploaded it a while ago but it got nominated for deletion. DoctorSpeed ✉️ ✨ 17:58, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thats correct. I was concerned at the time and went in search of the author. I believe you/someone have/has the evidence now to challenge that deletion .... and if successful then we have a new source of images for commons because these people understand the detail of our licencing requirements. 20:19, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
@Victuallers: I just read the comment, and I think there's a strong case for undeletion. If you want to, you can request its undeletion or re-upload with the documentation. DoctorSpeed ✉️ ✨

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:08, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:53, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:23, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:53, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:07, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:38, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Keiko_Fujimori&oldid=1256728037"