This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hampshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hampshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HampshireWikipedia:WikiProject HampshireTemplate:WikiProject HampshireHampshire
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
I recently edited this page in accordance with South African English, as the subject was born in South Africa and does not have any clear reason for ambiguous nationality. In so doing, I changed the note on variety of English at the top of the edit page to "South African" from "British," based on my understanding of MOS:ENGVAR—particularly MOS:RETAIN. Another editor quickly reverted my edits, claiming that "The variety Of English is determined at the time the article is created and should not be changed." I found this confusing, as I have never seen such a rule, and indeed, such a rule would go against almost everything related to MOS:RETAIN—which makes clear that varieties of English can and ought to be changed if there is just reason for doing so. Original guidelines for an article are not written in stone, especially if they are incorrect. I don't want to get into an edit war about this, of course, so I would like some clarification about it, as I am certain that varieties of English absolutely can be changed, and I would argue that the variety of English used in this article should be changed for the South African subject. Thanks. Anwegmann (talk) 21:08, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Anwegmann. I’ve read what you’ve had to say here, and at WP:FOOTY. I don’t see any issue in what you have said here or at WP:FOOTY, and you are correct as confirmed by other users already.
I’m not sure whether you’ve had a discussion with the relevant user/s that reverted your edits or whether they have seen this, so it may useful to ping them (ignore this part if they have already engaged or seen).
Thank you very much for the reply, @Fats40boy11. I appreciate your suggestions, and I figured that a public discussion is the best way to approach something that affects a wide variety of articles. That's why I initially did not treat this as a conflict between two users. I linked the WP:FOOTY discussion in my most recent edit summaries, to justify why I was doing the edit. But I will certainly ping the user (@Daemonickangaroo2018) who was making a different argument than that which I made here and at WP:FOOTY. Thanks, again. Anwegmann (talk) 19:54, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
