Talk:Keaton

Discussion

Red links

Removed the unexplained red link on Kearton. Looks cleaner, like other surname pages now

For the sake of neatness replaced the disembag catagory with a surname catagory, with a Zelda notation at the bottom. May this page rest in peace. JayKeaton 15:37, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Why remove a red link? A red link should only be removed if there is no prospect of an encyclopedia article of merit being written to fill the gap.

Please don't remove such red links. The whole encyclopedia is based on organic growth, where red links suggest directions for expansion.

'Neatness' of this kind is a total negative for the project.

Charles Matthews 16:04, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, you are quite wrong. I shall fix it JayKeaton 18:35, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also a bit of an overreaction don't you think? Deleting a scarcely related red link, in case someone forgets to put the R in while searching for Kearton, and that is "total negative for the project". A "total" negative? Take it easy mate, I've fixed it. Live with it. JayKeaton 19:23, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Davison has a link to Davidson. There are more ways of navigating the site than typing in the search box. You are also breaking policy by using edit comments that are likely to inflame (such as Readding a redundant red link was quite wrong, quite wrong); and by deleting from this talk page. You are really not in a strong position, and I have no idea why you are picking a fight over this. Or bothered to ask for an explanation on my Talk page, if you were going to ignore it. Charles Matthews 22:19, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't read peoples talk pages every day, so replies on my own talk page would have been appreciated JayKeaton 16:28, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Most people expect threads to continue on the page where they start. Charles Matthews 11:35, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"such as Keaton- aChiu (an extremely weak Pokemon)." Is it right? It make no sense!

Yeah the above needs to be fixed somehow. I suggest just deleting it.

"You are also breaking policy by using edit comments that are likely to inflame (such as Readding a redundant red link was quite wrong, quite wrong); and by deleting from this talk page. You are really not in a strong position, and I have no idea why you are picking a fight over this."

I say the same applies to you, Charles. You're so uptight lol.

Keaton (Legend of Zelda)

There's a link to the page Keaton (The Legend of Zelda series) at the bottom of this page, yet the page it redirects to doesn't contain any information about this particular character. Does anyone know where this information might now be found, or if the article has been removed, should this link also be removed? ~ Kamek77 21:39, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For reasons I cannot figure out, the page was forwarded to another page which contained no information at all about Keatons. Rather than add Keatons to that page, as it was already way too long, I simply reinstated the original Keaton page. The link is now correct as of this date JayKeaton 02:55, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]