Talk:Kazhdan–Lusztig polynomial

Borho Jantzen translation principle

Can you please provide reference to the work? I attempted to read

Borho, Jantzen, "Über primitive Ideale in der Einhüllenden einer halbeinfachen Lie-Algebra"

but did not understand much; where exactly can I read the explanation of what is claimed in Remark 1 of the Kazhdan-Lusztig conjectures? Tition1 (talk) 18:24, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request

In the section "Motivation and history" the sentence "The representation had two natural bases and the transition matrix between them is essentially given by the Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials" should be deleted since it is false. The entries of that matrix are integers not polynomials and their relation to the Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials is not known. In the same section , the sentence "The two bases of the Springer representation reminded ...." is not correct. To correct it, replace "Springer representation" by "Hecke algebra". In the section "Relation to intersection cohomology of Schubert varieties" the phrase "following a suggestion of Deligne" is not correct. It should be replaced by "using results of Deligne".173.76.154.248 (talk) 18:09, 21 January 2015 (UTC) 173.76.154.248 (talk) 03:24, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Elias and Williamson?

How does the work of Elias and Williamson fit in? http://cascade.uoregon.edu/spring2017/features/not-your-basic-algebra/

-- Vonfraginoff (talk) 10:42, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]