Jump to content

Talk:Kauai Plantation Railway

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk04:58, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Kauai Plantation Railway train
A Kauai Plantation Railway train

Created by Trainsandotherthings (talk). Self-nominated at 19:14, 27 August 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article meets eligibility criteria - recently expanded 5x. Meets length expectations for DYK. No issues with tone. Article has no issues with Copyvio per Earwig. My suspicion is that the newspaper clippings are not searchable via Earwig. Prelim manual comparison does not seem to show any issues. QPQ done. Picture seems to be rightly released. Seems alright at the resolution. Perhaps a closer view might be good, but, this is alright. Overall - nice small article and good to go. Makes me want to go back on a holiday to Kauai. Ktin (talk) 19:51, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Ktin:, and thanks for the quick review. If there's a photo you feel would be better within the Commons cat for the railway [2], let me know and we can change the image. I've never been to Hawaii, but writing this article certainly made me want to visit. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 13:30, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Trainsandotherthings: I like this one. If you like that as well, we could go with that? Alternately I am good to go with your original image. Ktin (talk) 18:44, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I like that one as well, I remember using it on GE 25-ton switcher. Let's go with that one. I've added it to the article and the DYK template. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 18:49, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Terminology

[edit]

Is it correct to call this a "heritage railroad" when it was built a few years ago (and not a century or so)? --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 20:28, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A heritage railway or heritage railroad (US usage) is a railway operated as living history to re-create or preserve railway scenes of the past. Please do your research before showing up to critique others' work; I'm getting tired of you trying to poke holes in everything I bring to DYK. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:48, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Kauai Plantation Railway/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 01:44, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

This is a relatively short article. As such, I don't have many issues with this article. Just a couple of things:

That's all for now.--ZKang123 (talk) 01:44, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, @ZKang123: I think I've responded to everything know. Let me know if you have any further comments. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 17:47, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No other outstanding problems I can find for this article. Issues raised are satisfactorily explained or addressed.--ZKang123 (talk) 00:18, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]