Jump to content

Talk:Katyn Commission

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Orphaned references in Katyn Commission

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Katyn Commission's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "kmw_note":

  • From Katyn massacre: "Soviet Note of 25 April 1943, severing unilaterally Soviet-Polish diplomatic relations, English translation of the Russian document". Electronic museum. Archived from the original on 16 June 2008. Retrieved 4 August 2011.
  • From Władysław Sikorski: Soviet Note of April 25, 1943, severing unilaterally Soviet-Polish diplomatic relations [1], last accessed on December 19, 2005, English translation of Polish document

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 18:54, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Katyn Commission. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:17, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"External Link" section: removal?

[edit]

Since it's gone back and forth in the edit history a few times, I thought it best to make a talk section before simply deleting the "External Link" section. That said, can anyone tell the relevance of those links? I was only able to access the archived one, but it seemed to bear no relation to the actual topic of the article beyond a brief mention of the coincidence in the dates of the Katyn Massacre and Stalin's death. If the link is even to an appropriate source, it seems that it would more properly be linked from an article about Stalin or his death. TheLetterThorn (talk) 00:07, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since it's been over a week with no comments, I went ahead and removed the links. I'm still open to discussion here if anyone has a compelling reason to re-add them. TheLetterThorn (talk) 00:26, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Good call. That link led to a conspiracy theory created by a very banned long-term pest; indeed it was him who was adding those links. He has been banned from all Wikimedia projects by the WMF, and all edits made by him should be reverted. JavaHurricane 16:01, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]