Talk:Kattunayakan

India: History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in March 2012.

Edits

Restructured the text to correct spelling, grammar and punctuation. Also tried to rewrite sentences to make them more readable. Added references and sub-headings. Article needs further work. --BwB (talk) 21:10, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kattunayakan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131107225208/http://censusindia.gov.in/Tables_Published/SCST/ST%20Lists.pdf to http://censusindia.gov.in/Tables_Published/SCST/ST%20Lists.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:42, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Different or same?

Is this the same as Jenu Kuruba? Joshua Project lists them as distinct [1] [2]. The first paragraph on the second column says that they are the same [3] (1988) while this recent report lists them as separate [4]. @Mushy Yank: @Kailash29792: DareshMohan (talk) 06:33, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]