Talk:Katsura Hoshino/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contribs) 12:44, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm currently busy with real-life activities, but since this nomination has been sitting for a while, I'd just like to leave some preliminary comments:

The biography section is a little short. Is it possible for this to be expaned further? If not, it could be merged with the works section.
Just a minor issue, but perhaps the "Publication" and "Anime" subsections could be moved elsewhere instead of being under the Works section?

Every statement is sourced and the writing is clear, so this should pass once the issues I've raised above are addressed. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 12:44, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll ping @TenTonParasol: considering she has most of the volumes that often talk about the author's childhood (I have few volumes since a friend shared me some when it was being published) but I'll still try to address your concerns. Thanks for the review.Tintor2 (talk) 13:13, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I tried addressing your issues. However, TenTon is busier during the weeks.Tintor2 (talk) 17:31, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Narutolovehinata5: I added one influence.Tintor2 (talk) 01:08, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bloop, I'm going to slide in per the ping and per previous heavy involvement in the development of this article. To address @Narutolovehinata5:'s concernes

The biography section is a little short. Is it possible for this to be expanded further? If not, it could be merged with the works section. It's very difficult to expand that. There is very little information available on Hoshino in the way of biography, so whatever little is in the article is basically what is out there. Tintor has already merged the sections, but I thought I should affirm that there is indeed very little wrt bio.
Just a minor issue, but perhaps the "Publication" and "Anime" subsections could be moved elsewhere instead of being under the Works section? The publications and anime sections are lists of what Hoshino has been credited on in some capacity. I'm not sure there is anywhere to move them. Do you think renaming the section would be better? They're essentially bibliography and filmography sections, though I'm not sure if those are appropriate titles.

As Tinor said, I'm very busy, but real life is clearing up, so I'll probably be more active in the near future. And I'll try to help address any concerns. ~Cheers, Ten Ton Parasol 02:09, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delay in replying, I got caught up with real-life matters again. But anyway, the lede has been expanded to a suitable length, every statement is sourced, and the article appears to be comprehensive enough given the sources available. Pass. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 14:10, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@TenTonParasol: @Tintor2: as an aside, I'm also nominating the article for DYK. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 14:10, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay. Thanks for the review.Tintor2 (talk) 15:18, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]